Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriel Decamps vs Felipe Pagnacco Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Decamps vs Pagnacco analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriel Decamps vs Felipe Pagnacco Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Decamps has won 50.47% of points on his second serve, while Pagnacco has won 40.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Decamps, in recent form, has won 55.89% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pagnacco has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.76% and 38.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Decamps has saved 54.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pagnacco has saved 51.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Decamps has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 35/ 20), with Pagnacco winning 60.61% (W/L 20/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12). Pagnacco has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.77% of matches (W/L 30/ 13), where as Pagnacco has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 20/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Decamps winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Decamps winning 2 and Pagnacco winning 0. The last match between Decamps and Pagnacco was at the M15 Santiago, 18-04-2024, Second, Clay with Gabriel Decamps getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Decamps and Pagnacco have played a deciding set 0 times, with Decamps winning 0 times and Pagnacco 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Decamps winning 0, and Pagnacco 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Decamps has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.53 while Pagnacco has played against players with an average rank of 30.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Decamps has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pagnacco has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Decamps has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pagnacco has converted 62.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Decamps 1 - 0 Pagnacco
630
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
63% (162-94)
Career Total W/L
61% (20-13)
68% (19-9)
YTD W/L
67% (14-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gabriel Decamps | Felipe Pagnacco |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (20/35) | 62% (36/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (15/20) | 56% (20/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (10/15) | 14% (3/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (35/58) | 29% (10/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriel Decamps | Felipe Pagnacco |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (19/9) | 67% (14/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (41/20) | 59% (29/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (321/245) | 52% (253/232) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 74% (14/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 68% (13/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.05 |
| DFs Total | 93 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:24 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 185.71 | 48.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (978/1573) | 65% (347/537) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (665/978) | 56% (195/347) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (293/595) | 41% (77/190) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (94/205) | 63% (22/35) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (755/1707) | 42% (202/481) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (17/7) | 67% (14/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (18/26) | 65% (13/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 14% (1/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 83% (5/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (16/16) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (16/0) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 40% (10/4) |
Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Gabriel Decamps
52%
(
53 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Bancalari
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Thiago Cigarran
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
63 of
116)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Felipe Pagnacco Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lucca Guercio
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felipe Pagnacco
Player
Alejandro Bancalari
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Estevez
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
80%
(
64 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Decamps Vs Pagnacco Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
